Seems that on my birthday, May 7, 2008, over 75 evangelical / church leaders and laity published a document called "An Evangelical Manifesto."
Mark, Steve, Eric, Dale, Billy and other fellow "professional clergy" out there, and Linda and other laity . . . any comments or concerns after reading this?
I haven't quite gotten through my first full read of the document, but have done quite a bit of underlining. Before I started to read this, I had just finished a summary of General Conference . . . so the filter through which I read the Manifesto may have been slightly skewed.
Ever forward . . . ><>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't feel dressed without having a pen, pencil and notebook with me!
I'm at the age where I pretty much know what I like to have with me in terms of every-day-carry. I like 4"x6" sized notebook...
-
I really enjoyed finally connecting with the great staff at Wiley Funeral Home & Cremation Service here in Granbury, TX. I was asked ... -
My #1 favorite song is Somewhere Over the Rainbow / What A Wonderful World as sung by the late Israel Kamakawiwo'Ole. My #2 favorite so...
2 comments:
almost as many signers as there are pickers in your blog's header picture... :)
i had some hesitations and misgivings before reading the document, but was actually quite impressed and invigorated after taking in the whole of what it addressed.
one of the things i like about the document is that the authors choose not to say that creationism and inerrancy are non-negotiables. for the first, there’s very little biblical justification anymore behind whatever the latest flavor of anti-natural-selection dessert is being served up; for the latter, somehow we can admit that we can’t prove the existence of God, but goshdarnit we have a golden egg this unprovable God laid right here. there’s simply too much of a tendency to add items to the ever-increasing laundry list of ideas and doctrines to which we have to pledge allegiance before we’re allowed into the room marked “Christian.”
more than anything, i found myself motivated and energized by the very positive nature of the piece - that it isn’t yet another “here’s everything we’re against” rant but an effort to make the gospel again a message of good news. imagine that - the gospel being good news. American Christianity has lost this defining characteristic that once served it well.
there are a few things i question, but nothing is going to please everyone, i suppose. for instance, i’m not sure i agree with this statement: We Evangelicals should be defined theologically, and not politically, socially, or culturally. Jesus’ message uses “action” verbs: teach them to DO as I have commanded you, LOVE God and LOVE your neighbor, by this will all men know … if you LOVE one another. any theology that defines us must have feet.
i did, however, like these words:
We are also troubled by the fact that the advance of globalization and the emergence of a global public square finds no matching vision of how we are to live freely, justly, and peacefully with our deepest differences on the global stage.
somehow we've got to figure out how we we're going to happily share the same bathroom over the next few decades in our ever-shrinking world.
one interesting thing: maybe i missed it, but there doesn’t seem to be a great emphasis on evangelism in this Evangelical Manifesto. was that intentional? i didn’t see a single chick tract referenced in the bibliography…
perhaps one unintended benefit of the proposal is a clear opportunity to take this EM (Evangelical Manifesto) and align it with the other EM (Emergent Manifesto) and finally have all our EM & EMs in a row without demonizing the other side.
one can only hope…
mike rucker
fairburn, georgia, usa
mikerucker.wordpress.com
Mike, thanks for the input. I will begin my 2nd read of the manifesto this week.
Post a Comment